You know that meeting attendance chicken game where everyone suddenly becomes very, very busy exactly 30 seconds before a 10+ person meeting is supposed to start? Yeah, that one. The one nobody talks about but everybody plays.

It’s 2:59 PM. Your calendar dings with that cheerful little notification that makes your stomach drop: “Meeting starts in 1 minute.” You look at the attendee list. Twelve people. You do the math in your head. If twelve people are invited, maybe six will show up. If you’re one of the first three to join, the odds of having to actually contribute skyrocket. If you’re lucky and join seventh or eighth, you can probably ride this meeting out in blissful silence with your camera off and your microphone muted, occasionally nodding at nothing.
But here’s the thing: everyone else is doing the exact same calculation.
The Strategic Late Arrival
There’s an unspoken art to joining a large meeting “fashionably late” without it being so late that someone notices. The sweet spot is somewhere between 2-4 minutes after the official start time. Early enough that the meeting hasn’t really gotten going yet, late enough that you’re definitely not going to be voluntold to take notes or “kick us off.”
The beauty of the 2-4 minute delay is that it comes with a built-in excuse library:
- “Sorry, I was on another call that ran over”
- “Sorry, had to step away for a second”
- “Sorry, Teams was acting weird”
- Or the classic non-apology: silence plus immediately going on mute
Nobody questions it. Nobody can question it, because they were playing the exact same game.
The Waiting Room Standoff
Virtual meetings have added a delicious new dimension to meeting attendance chicken: the waiting room standoff. You join the meeting, you see you’re in the waiting room, and you notice there are two other participants also waiting.
Now the game becomes: do you leave and rejoin in 60 seconds, hoping that someone else will have been admitted by then? Do you just sit there, accepting your fate as a potential early joiner? Do you send a chat message to the organizer who definitely isn’t paying attention to the waiting room because they’re also hoping someone else joins first?
I’ve seen waiting rooms with seven people in them while the actual meeting room sits empty except for the organizer, who is frantically refreshing their email and pretending they can’t see the growing crowd of digital loiterers outside their virtual door.
The Camera Conundrum
The meeting starts. Six brave souls (or six people who got trapped joining early) are sitting there with their cameras on, staring at each other in a Brady Bunch grid of awkwardness. The meeting organizer is trying to make small talk while nervously glancing at the participant count, which is ticking up one person every 45 seconds.
Then someone joins with their camera off. Then another. Then three more in rapid succession, all camera-off. Now the early joiners are stuck. Do they turn their cameras off and look like they’re bailing on the meeting? Do they keep them on and look like try-hards? The meeting organizer, feeling the silent pressure, makes a weak attempt: “Feel free to turn your cameras on if you’d like!”
Nobody does.
The Mute-Olympics
Joining late grants you the precious gift of the muted entrance. You can slip into a meeting like a ninja, your name appearing in the participant list with all the fanfare of a whisper. The early joiners didn’t have this luxury. They joined when the room was quiet, when every microphone activation sounded like a foghorn, when the organizer was still hopeful enough to greet people by name.
“Oh hey Sarah! Good to see you! And there’s Marcus! How was your weekend, Marcus?”
Marcus had to answer. Marcus had to engage. Marcus made small talk about his weekend for 90 seconds while eight other people were waiting in the hallway, synchronizing their watches, preparing to execute the perfect late-but-not-too-late entrance.
By the time the meeting actually starts, Marcus is exhausted from carrying the entire pre-meeting conversation, and the late joiners are sitting pretty, cameras off, mics muted, ready to contribute absolutely nothing for the next 60 minutes.
The Peak Late-Join
There exists a theoretical perfect moment for joining a meeting that I call the “Peak Late-Join.” This is the moment when:
- The meeting has officially started
- The organizer has given up waiting for more people
- They’ve moved past introductions
- They haven’t yet gotten to anything of substance
- Nobody is keeping track of who just joined
The Peak Late-Join typically occurs somewhere between 4-7 minutes after the scheduled start time, depending on the organizer’s patience level and the corporate culture around punctuality. Join at Peak Late-Join and you’ve achieved meeting attendance nirvana: you’re here, you’re technically not late, and there’s absolutely zero chance you’re getting voluntold to do anything.
The Participation Probability Matrix
Let’s be honest about the math here. In a 12-person meeting:
- Join in the first minute: 80% chance you’ll have to actively participate
- Join in minutes 2-4: 45% chance of participation
- Join at minutes 5-6: 20% chance of participation
- Join at minute 7+: 15% chance anyone remembers you’re there
The truly advanced players have spreadsheets. They’ve calculated the optimal join time for every recurring meeting on their calendar. They know that the Monday morning team sync doesn’t really start until minute 8 because Brad is always late. They know that the Friday afternoon retro has a critical mass threshold of 6 people before it kicks off. They know exactly when to maximize their presence credit while minimizing their participation liability.
The Organizer’s Dilemma
Spare a thought for the meeting organizer, sitting there at 2:59 PM, watching their nice neat 3:00 PM start time approach like a freight train. They’ve got their agenda ready. They’ve got their slides loaded. They’ve got their talking points memorized.
2:59 PM: One person in the meeting (them) 3:00 PM: Two people in the meeting 3:01 PM: Two people in the meeting 3:02 PM: Four people in the meeting 3:03 PM: Six people in the meeting 3:04 PM: Nine people in the meeting 3:05 PM: Nine people in the meeting 3:06 PM: Eleven people in the meeting
Do they start at 3:00 when only two people are there and then have to recap everything five times as people trickle in? Do they wait until 3:06 and look like they can’t manage a schedule? Do they passive-aggressively say “okay, let’s get started” at 3:02 when the room is still half-empty?
The organizer is playing their own game of chicken: “Who cracks first, me or the absent attendees?”
Spoiler alert: the organizer always cracks first.
The Post-Meeting Guilt
After successfully executing a flawless late join, spending 55 minutes on mute with your camera off, and contributing exactly zero words to the conversation, you’ll feel a tiny pang of guilt. A whisper in the back of your mind asking “should I have participated more?”
This guilt lasts approximately 12 seconds, until your calendar dings again.
“Meeting starts in 1 minute.”
And the game begins anew.
The Unspoken Rules
Like any good game of chicken, meeting attendance chicken has rules that everyone follows but nobody acknowledges:
- Never call out the late joiners (you’ll be one next time)
- Never join a meeting early enough to be alone with the organizer
- If you join late, apologize once and then never speak again
- The first person to join bears the conversation burden until person number three arrives
- Camera-off is acceptable after the 5-minute mark
- Nobody tracks attendance in a 10+ person meeting anyway
The Future of Meeting Chicken
As we’ve settled into this remote and hybrid work world, meeting attendance chicken has evolved from an occasional tactic into a full-blown strategic discipline. Some companies have tried to fight it with “cameras on” policies or “must join on time” rules, but these are the flailings of a dying regime. You cannot stop meeting attendance chicken any more than you can stop the tide.
The game is eternal. The game is inevitable. The game is happening right now in a conference room (virtual or physical) near you.
Someone is looking at their clock. Someone is doing the math. Someone is waiting just one more minute before they click that “Join” button.
And somewhere, a meeting organizer is sitting alone in a virtual room, wondering where everybody is, knowing full well that everyone is out there, together, waiting for everyone else to go first.
Have your own meeting attendance chicken stories? Of course you do. We all do. Because we’re all playing the same game, hoping nobody notices we’re playing, while simultaneously knowing that everyone else is playing too.
Just remember: the only winning move is to join late enough that nobody expects anything from you, but not so late that anyone notices you joined late. It’s a delicate balance. An art form, really.
Good luck out there. May your joins be strategically timed and your participation be mercifully minimal.
Leave a Reply